Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

18.222.188.129
dgid:
enl:
npi:0
-Advertisement-
-Advertisement-
Movement Disorders

Non-invasive brain stimulation shows promise for ataxia, but more research needed to confirm efficacy

Posted on

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including rTMS and tES, shows potential in reducing ataxia symptoms in patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxia (DCA), according to a study.

-Advertisement-
-Advertisement-

However, due to a serious risk of bias and low certainty of the evidence in the analyzed studies, more high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

A systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 17 randomized controlled trials with a total of 661 patients assessed using the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and 606 patients evaluated with the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Despite showing a significant reduction in ataxia symptoms, as measured by SARA (MD = -2.49) and ICARS (MD = -5.27), the studies exhibited a serious risk of bias and low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses suggested that both rTMS and tES were effective, with no significant difference between the methods. Further analysis highlighted the importance of rTMS frequency and the total number of tES sessions in reducing ataxia symptoms.

Reference
Matsugi A, Ohtsuka H, Bando K, et al. Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Sep 2. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14205. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39221650.

 

-Advertisement-
-Advertisement-
-Advertisement-